業績會第一現場

was live · ·

QuantumScape 2025Q3業績直播

Key Takeaways (AI-Generated)

Financial Performance:

- QuantumScape reported a GAAP net loss of $105.8 million and an adjusted EBITDA loss of $61.4 million for Q3 2025.

- They raised $263.5 million of net proceeds from their at-the-market equity program, ending the quarter with $1.0 billion in liquidity.

- Customer billings totaled $12.8 million for Q3, reflecting initial commercial activities.

Business Progress:

- Announced a collaboration with Volkswagen for the Ducati V21L, involving field testing of their QSE-5 battery technology.

- Shipping of Cobra-based QSE-5 B1 samples began, achieving a key operational goal.

- Installation of higher volume cell production equipment on their Eagle Line is on track.

- Expanded commercial engagements including a new joint development agreement and active engagements with a top 10 global automotive OEM.

- Added Corning and Murata as ecosystem partners to develop ceramic separator manufacturing capabilities.

Opportunities:

- Strategic collaborations with industry leaders like Volkswagen, Ducati, Audi, PowerCo, Corning, and Murata to drive advancement and commercialization of next-generation battery technology.

- Developing a capital-light development and licensing business model focusing on monetizing collaboration, licensing, and ecosystem partnerships.

Next Quarter Guidance:

- Full-year adjusted EBITDA loss guidance improved to $245 million to $260 million.

- Revised full-year capital expenditure guidance to $30 million to $40 million.

- Plan to focus updates on customer billings rather than cash runway projections in future communications.

Risks:

- Technical and commercial challenges in scaling and integrating new battery technologies into real-world applications.

- Dependence on achieving projected scales and performance metrics in forthcoming field tests and commercial deployments.

Full Transcript (AI-Generated)

Operator

Good day, and welcome to QuantumScape's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Dan Conway, Quantum Spaces -- my apologies, QuantumScape's Principal Analyst, Investor Relations, you may begin your conference.

Daniel Conway

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and thank you to everyone for joining QuantumScape's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. To supplement today's discussion, please go to our IR website at ir.quantumscape.com to view our shareholder letter.

Before we begin, I want to call your attention to the safe harbor provision for forward-looking statements that is posted on our website as part of our quarterly update. Forward-looking statements generally relate to future events, future technology progress or future financial or operating performance. Our expectations and beliefs regarding these matters may not materialize. Actual results and financial periods are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. There are risk factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the contents of our forward-looking statement for the reasons that we cite in our shareholder letter, Form 10-K and other SEC filings, including uncertainties posed by the difficulty in predicting future outcomes.

Joining us today will be QuantumScape's CEO, Dr. Siva Sivaram; and our CFO, Kevin Hettrich.

With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Siva.

Siva Sivaram

Thank you, Dan. I'd like to begin with one of the highlights of the year. On September 8, at IAA Mobility in Munich, Germany, we unveiled our launch program with the Volkswagen Group, the Ducati V21L race motorcycle, developed as a collaboration among Ducati, Audi, PowerCo and QS. The Ducati V21L is a first of its kind vehicle demonstration planned as a showcase for the exceptional performance of our no-compromise next-generation battery technology.

As a launch program, the Ducati V21L is ideal. It is a low volume but high visibility demonstration that allows us to put the QSE-5 technology into a demanding real-world application. The next step for the Ducati program is field testing. Turning to our annual goals. We are pleased to report that during Q3, we began shipping Cobra-based QSE-5 B1 samples, completing another of our key annual goals for 2025.

These cells are part of the Ducati launch program and were featured on stage at the IAA Mobility Conference. Our remaining operational goal for the year is to install higher volume cell production equipment for our highly automated pilot line in San Jose named the Eagle Line. Equipment for certain key assembly steps has already been installed on the Eagle Line, and this goal remains on track.

Another important goal for 2025 has been to expand our commercial engagement, including deepening relationships with the existing customers, engaging new customers and bringing additional partners into our growing QS technology ecosystem. In Q3, we made substantial progress on all three aspects. With respect to existing customers, the successful launch event with Ducati, Audi and PowerCo at IAA Mobility was a major milestone in our long collaboration with the Volkswagen Group.

Last quarter, we also announced a new joint development agreement with an existing customer, and we are continuing to work closely with them as we progress through the first phase of the development and commercialization engagement. We are also in an active engagement with a new top 10 global automotive OEM in addition to our existing customers. With regard to QS ecosystem development, we continue to add world-class partners.

On September 30, we announced an agreement with Corning to jointly develop ceramic separator manufacturing capabilities based on our Cobra process. Corning is a global leader in advanced materials, and they bring deep expertise in ceramics processing and proven manufacturing excellence to the QS ecosystem. In parallel, we successfully completed the initial phase of our collaboration with Murata Manufacturing, have signed a subsequent contract and progressed to the next phase of that relationship.

Our goal is to make QS technology the clear choice by providing our customers with a turnkey ecosystem to serve the global demand for better batteries. With Murata and Corning, we have two of the most world-renowned technical ceramics manufacturers as ecosystem partners, and we will continue to grow our ecosystem further. With our achievements this quarter, our vision for commercialization of our next-generation battery technology is beginning to take shape.

We are executing consistently towards our key annual goals, demonstrating our technology, engaging with partners and building out our capital-light development and licensing business model. Everything starts with execution, and we are proud of our team's performance. This year, we have already accomplished two of our key operational goals, baselining our Cobra process and beginning shipment of the Cobra-based QSE-5 cells, continuing our track record of consistent execution against our goals.

Q3 also saw our first public technology demonstration with the Volkswagen Group, the Ducati V21L. We are expanding our collaboration with existing customers and adding new customers, and we have also expanded our global ecosystem of world-class partners. The third quarter also marks another exciting milestone. We are beginning to show returns from our capital-light development and licensing business model, driving over $12 million in customer billings in Q3.

Our ambitious targets naturally present many challenges to overcome, and there is much work left to do. Our objective is clear: revolutionize energy storage, capitalize on our enormous market opportunity and create exceptional value for our shareholders. With this aim in mind, we are excited to update shareholders on our continued progress over the months and years to come. With that, let me hand things over to Kevin for a word on our financial outlook.

Kevin Hettrich

Thank you, Siva. GAAP operating expenses and GAAP net loss in Q3 were $115 million and $105.8 million, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA loss was $61.4 million in Q3, in line with expectations. A table reconciling GAAP net loss and adjusted EBITDA is available in the financial statement at the end of our shareholder letter. We continue to drive operational efficiency consistent with our capital licensing focus. We revised and improved our full year guidance for adjusted EBITDA loss to $245 million to $260 million.

Capital expenditures in the third quarter were $9.6 million. Q3 CapEx primarily supported facilities and equipment purchases for the Eagle Line. As a result of efficiency gains and process improvements, including from the Cobra process as well as a change in timing of certain equipment ordering, we revised the range of our full year guidance for CapEx to $30 million to $40 million.

In Q3, we bolstered our balance sheet and completed our at-the-market equity program, raising $263.5 million of net proceeds in advance of the August 10 expiration of our shelf registration. We ended the quarter with $1.0 billion in liquidity. We now project our cash runway extends through the end of the decade, a 12-month extension from our previous guidance of into 2029.

Going forward, we plan to move away from providing updates on cash runway, and we'll begin providing updates on customer billings. Customer billings represent the total value of all invoices issued by QS to our customers and partners in the period regardless of accounting treatment. Customer billings is a key operational metric meant to give insight into customer activity and future cash inflows. The metric is not a substitute for revenue under U.S. GAAP.

Customer billings in Q3 were $12.8 million. In Q3, we invoiced VW PowerCo under the upgraded deal announced in July. The resulting cash inflows benefit QS shareholders. They will be directly reflected on the balance sheet as cash when we receive payment. During the collaboration phase of this particular deal, because of the related party relationship with VW in accordance with U.S. GAAP, a liability of equivalent value will also be created.

QS has no repayment obligation with respect to these liabilities. Once relieved, rather than impacting the P&L, this value will accrue directly to shareholders' equity. Payments from other customers or partners, we expect will be accounted for differently due to the lack of equity ownership or significant related party ties.

Daniel Conway

Thanks, Kevin. We'll begin today's Q&A portion with a few questions we've received from investors or that I believe investors would be interested in. Siva, the world's first lot demonstration of QS solid-state lithium metal batteries in a Ducati V21L motorcycle premiered at IAA Mobility on September 9. Why is this such an important milestone? And what are the next steps on your commercialization road map?

Siva Sivaram

Dan, that announcement and seeing the bike right across the stage was an emotional moment for all of us at QS and was obviously a huge milestone. For all of our employees, investors and partners, that was long in the making. Now we'll be demonstrating our battery in the field and gathering as much data as possible from field testing. Stepping back a bit, this was a major step in our strategic blueprint. You can think of this as four tracks that are running in parallel, the Ducati program, our PowerCo relationship, our other customers and our ecosystem development.

With respect to PowerCo more broadly, as announced at IAA Mobility, we are working toward automotive-grade standards with the goal of a series production car with QS technology before the end of the decade. With respect to other customers, we are working towards commercialization deals with additional automotive OEMs. And of course, we are building out our ecosystem with world-class partners like Murata and Corning so that we can handle our customer -- automotive customers a turnkey supply chain to serve the massive and growing demand for our technology. These are the main areas that we have to execute on.

Daniel Conway

Thanks, Siva. On that note, QS continues to advance discussions with key high-precision ceramics players, most recently announcing an agreement with Corning and advancing our partnership with Murata. How does this fit into the company's overall strategy of building out the QS global partner ecosystem? What are the key benefits of this business model and some potential ways QS may receive economics from these partnerships?

Siva Sivaram

Dan, QS' proprietary ceramic solid-state separator is our core IP. It enables our anode-free architecture and its performance advantage. Our strategy involves partnering with specialized high-precision ceramic manufacturers such as Murata and Corning to scale up separator production. These partners would supply QS separators to cell manufacturers like PowerCo could handle final cell assembly.

This aggregated model allows QS to, one, leverage the manufacturing expertise and balance sheets of partners with strong reputations in manufacturing as well as IP protection. Two, ceramic production is a highly specialized skill set. And this allows our cell production partners to focus on their core competency. And three, this accelerates the scale-up of our technology by tapping into their manufacturing capabilities.

In short, Corning and Murata are part of a complementary and expanding global ecosystem designed to derisk, scale up and enable a capital-efficient path to commercialization. We believe each partner contributes unique strengths to help us efficiently scale our separator production into high volumes. As you would expect, we are continuing to build out the entire QS ecosystem with additional partners.

Kevin Hettrich

And just to add on to that, in the fullness of time, the ecosystem would represent a third source of cash inflow under our capital-light development and licensing business model. The first is monetizing collaboration and customization work with our OEM partners. The second and largest source of inflows would be licensing as our customers produce cells using our technology. The third one would be value sharing from our ecosystem partners.

Daniel Conway

Thanks, Kevin. Can you expand further on customer billings as a key operational metric? How do customer billings translate into cash inflows?

Kevin Hettrich

First, to expand on the significance of customer billings. Our first ever invoices totaling $12.8 million in Q3 2025 are by themselves an important commercial milestone in the history of our company. It's nice to have arrived at the chapter where we are billing customers. I'd also highlight to investors that customer billings are evidence of our capital-light business model at work. On the front end, we monetize development activities for our customers to tailor our core technology to meet their specific needs. Subsequently, as the customer ramps production, we realize royalties over the lifetime of the project. As we continue to develop further generations of our technology, we'll seek to maintain these lines of business to generate consistent and compelling cash flows.

Payment for development activities has the benefit of being near term. The royalty payments represent the majority of the value capture opportunity through a consistent long-term stream of high gross margin revenue. Value sharing from ecosystem partners represents further opportunity for shareholder returns. I'd also ask investors to keep four things in mind when interpreting our customer billings metric. First, the metric is not a substitute for revenue under U.S. GAAP. Second, the accounting for individual customer billings may differ significantly. Third, the amounts billed to customers may vary from quarter-to-quarter due to fluctuations in activity as we progress through various phases of an agreed scope of work. Lastly, it is important to note that future cash inflows can diverge from customer billings, for example, as a result of timing differences, payment terms, prepaid customer deposits or any adjustments to final payment amounts.

Daniel Conway

Okay. Thanks so much, Kevin. We're now ready to begin the live portion of today's call. Operator, please open up the line for questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Winnie Dong with Deutsche Bank.

Yan Dong

First question, I was hoping you can help me understand a bit more about the joint development of the ceramic separators with Corning, which you recently announced. If you can help me sort of understand maybe similarities or the differences in comparison to Murata. And then on Murata itself, you said you've successfully completed the initial phase of the collaboration and then you've also signed a subsequent contract. I was hoping if you can also there, help me better understand the nature of those agreements, perhaps some details of the economics or the technology know-how in terms of the transfer of it? That's my first question.

Siva Sivaram

Thank you. Thanks for the question. As you pointed out, this is an extremely important aspect of our business model to bring an ecosystem together for QS. And ceramic manufacturing is, as I mentioned earlier, extremely specialized skill set, and we want to bring people with us who can manufacture in high volume, taking our Cobra process and ramping it into the volume and using their balance sheet to put capital in building these factories up.

And so when we started out with Murata about nine months ago, they -- we both entered into a development agreement where they came in to evaluate what we needed to do, what do they need to do, et cetera. They concluded that, and we entered to the next system where we start to go ramp our relationship into a much higher level with commitments of volumes, et cetera. And they understand what are the volumes involved and what our customers' needs are, et cetera. So we are getting to be in that phase where we can take Cobra and ramp in volume.

We have been working with Corning throughout this time as well. Corning had also been under an early development contract with us. And then we came into a more detailed relationship as we announced in early September. And the reason we need two of them is, as you would think, is pretty obvious, the opportunity is so large that it is good for us to have two suppliers. And initially, they will be complementary in different aspects of the ceramic processing, but I expect over the long term to have a much larger portion that each one of them does.

And so both of them are extraordinarily competent manufacturing partners, and they are excited to be part of this relationship. I spent time with both CEOs at length, and they are very, very eager for them to get launched into high-volume production to work with our big OEM partners.

Yan Dong

That's very helpful. And then second question is the new metric that you just introduced the customer billings metric. I was wondering if you can give us maybe a rough idea on the conversion time to revenue or to collection of those funds? And then is that sort of like the main metric then you will be providing over time as opposed to sort of bringing out what revenue could look like in the next maybe one to two years or so. So I just wanted to understand that dynamic a little bit better. And then I think last quarter, you mentioned there is some investigation being done in terms of revenue recognition. And I was hoping if you can also tie that into the results.

Kevin Hettrich

Winnie, so just to outlined back the question part, there was go into the definition of customer billings, talk about their importance and also on the accounting treatment of VW, PowerCo. So I'll take them in order. So just to be on the same page, we define customer billings as the total value of all invoices issued by QS to our customers and partners in the period regardless of accounting treatment. And where we hope it's useful to investors is it's a key operational metric to give insight into customer activity and into future cash inflows.

I think you also had a question on how those translate into the timing of cash flow payments. So there, I did mention in my remarks that you could see a divergence from billings to future cash inflows for a variety of reasons. Those could include things like timing differences in payment from customers, prepaid customer deposits, adjustments to final payment amounts, typical operational considerations there.

You asked about the importance. First of all, it is very nice to be in this chapter where we're doing work of value to customers and billing them for it. So that's a nice moment for the -- our company. And on the VW, PowerCo treatment, the way that the accounting works is the cash inflows, of course, at a broader perspective, benefit QuantumScape shareholders. They'll be reflected on the balance sheet as cash when we receive them. During the collaboration phase of the VW PowerCo deal, because of the related party relationship with VW in accordance with U.S. GAAP, a liability of equivalent value will also be created.

A reminder to shareholders, we do not have a repayment obligation with respect to these liabilities. And upon relief of the reliability rather than impacting the P&L, this value will accrue directly to shareholders' equity. So this accounting treatment is specific to the collaboration phase of VW PowerCo. Payments from other customers or partners, we expect to be accounted for differently due to the lack of equity ownership or significant related party ties.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Jed Dorsheimer with William Blair.

Mark Shooter

Hi, everybody. You have Mark Shooter on for Dorsheimer. Congrats on the B-sample progress and especially the Ducati demo. It's always -- there's a lot of learnings in actually creating the pack and integration. So congrats on that. During that presentation, VW mentioned cells and EVs by the end of the decade. If we were to take this as 2030, does this track with your development time line? So if we're assuming that B samples meet all the required cell specs and a C-sample stage gate is when you're producing those cells at scale. And four to five years seems a bit longer than we expected. So what do you think are the remaining technical boxes that need to be checked? And is there any opportunity to pull this forward with VW or potentially a little competition with the other two customer engagements you have ongoing?

Siva Sivaram

Mark, thanks for the question. By the way, just to be technically correct, end of the decade is 2029, okay? So just to make sure we don't add an extra year into the calendar. The second thing is, look, actual productization belongs to the customer, and they announce plans the way they say it. Our job is to make sure we are going all out. We do everything that we can to make sure they are able to ramp as fast as they can. We are working hand in glove very closely with Volkswagen and PowerCo. They know exactly the status of the industrialization because we are working closely with them, and we will continue to do that.

Now in parallel, when we go work with the new customers that we are talking about, both with an existing customer and a new customer, that's a completely independent path from what we are doing with Volkswagen. We don't try to go create competition for our customers, but we work very, very, very closely with each customer, adapting our technical road map to their product road map. And that work goes on real time so that we can get to market as quickly as possible. But as Kevin points out, in the meantime, they continue to pay us for the development activity that we do together.

Mark Shooter

Appreciate the color. Thanks, Siva. 2029 it is, I didn't mean to assume 2030 there. Alright.

Kevin Hettrich

One engineering group to another before the end of the decade, December 31, 2029.

Mark Shooter

Got it. Loud and clear. About the VW relationship as well, in the last iteration of this, there was some space left in for other potential applications where VW could source cells and sell to other markets potentially. Was this written in to give space to the Ducati program? Or should we be looking at even more adjacent markets? Is there any potential there?

Siva Sivaram

Yes. I actually do not want to again talk about the customer. But you're absolutely right. We are looking at non-Volkswagen Group applications as well into that contract. And Ducati being part of the Volkswagen Group would be included in the regular production. And we do expect to have partnerships across both independent of Volkswagen Group with other new customers and customers working with PowerCo that we both work together.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from the line of Mark Delaney with Goldman Sachs.

Aman Gupta

You have Aman on for Mark. Congrats on the progress. Maybe on the other two customers that you mentioned in your prepared remarks, Siva, could you maybe help us get a sense of on where the JDA stands with the customer you had announced last quarter and what needs to happen to get that to a more of a complete commercial agreement? And similarly, on the top 10 global auto OEM you mentioned you're in active engagement with what it would take to go from the active engagement to a licensing or a JDA agreement?

Siva Sivaram

Aman, thanks for the question. Of course, we are very, very excited about these two additional opportunities. We've been alluding to them over the last couple of quarters as to their maturation. And we've been already in active engagement with them. As always, we let the OEMs do the announcement and we follow them. You saw that at the IAA, we had Volkswagen come out and talk in detail about how they are taking the product in through different applications that they have in mind. The same way we will be doing that with these two as well. As much as I would love to talk about it ahead of time, it would not be appropriate for me to come and tell you how they are doing. But you will see over time, as they start to talk about it more and more, you will get a clearer idea of who they are, what they are doing and how they are doing. And I'm very excited about these prospects.

Aman Gupta

Thank you for the color. And then maybe secondly, on this partnership approach, recognizing the Corning and Murata relationships for the ceramic separator. I think you mentioned the possibility of expanding the ecosystem to other areas for QS. Can you give us a sense of what areas you might be looking to include for partnerships? And what the kind of structure of these partnerships looks like from maybe a financial standpoint as well?

Siva Sivaram

Yes. I'll start with the partnership, and then Kevin will give you the financial impact of those. Look, we are developing a technology ground up that is very, very different than its -- both its potential, its capabilities, scale up from regular battery technologies. So wherever possible, we like to include competent and reliable partners from the ecosystem to be with us to invest capital. So we talked about these two with respect to the ceramic separators.

We have the high-touch transfer when we develop this no compromise solution, we want to be able to give them, whether it is materials, whether it is equipment, whether it is processes, whether it is software, whether it is metrology, we want to wrap all of this together in a package that they can ramp. And in each of this, where we have original IP and where we have unique capabilities, we like partners to come along with us.

We want to make it as easy as possible for our OEM customers to ramp production as quickly as possible. And so it would behoove us to bring these partners along. We are -- we continue to evaluate additional partners to join the team. And you can see the quality, the caliber of the partners that we choose to work with us.

Kevin Hettrich

On the finance side, as much as the cell is differentiated with our solid-state lithium metal technology with the energy density, the charge time and safety, we think that we're equally proud of the business model as well. We think that's good for shareholders. It's capital light, helps us focus on where we think we add value the most, which is an innovation and customer empowerment. It allows each member of our cell manufacturer, customer ecosystem player to play to their strengths, which we think is in terms of time and effectiveness and risk-adjusted path to market best.

And in terms of how our QuantumScape shareholders see value from that, it really comes from three ways. The differentiation of the self-performance creates value and our shareholders capture it in three ways. The first would be the monetization of the collaboration work. You saw that in this quarter, $12.8 million of customer billings, longer-term licensing when our customers are producing our cells from their factories, we get a licensing stream. And then finally, it would be value sharing with our ecosystem partners. That together, we think each of those is important in itself and also gives a robustness to our approach.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] And with no further questions at this time, I will now turn the conference back over to QuantumScape management for closing remarks.

Siva Sivaram

Thank you, operator. Finally, today, I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate the entire QS team on their outstanding performance this quarter and the execution that they have shown in making this IAA announcement so powerful and well received. And as always, thank you to our shareholders for their continued support. We look forward to updating you on further progress in the months to come. Thank you.

Operator

And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's call, and we thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Details at QuantumScape IR

Tips: The content presented above were generated by AI language model with publicly available information and auto-generated subtitles from third-party. The above material does not represent the position of Futu and shall not constitute any investment advice. Futu makes no express or implied warranties or representations regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the information shown in the above content.

137K Views