I just saw a tweet from the "Financial Union":
Well, what can I say about this?Public fund managers are not so humble, not to mention the bank wealth management subsidiary, the bank is also a member of the institution, not wealthy retail investors.
A few days ago, I posted a post about a rumor of a small composition:
Is it the distortion of human nature or the loss of morality that is popular through the grapevine?
And the day after I posted this post, there was a story about $SMIC (00981.HK)$Small composition, and then was refuted rumors, now the small composition is really too rampant.
Back to the point, this time the debt base and even bank wealth management products have withdrawn sharply, which should shatter the investment values of many people, because since entering the market, we have been saying that bonds are stable assets. and bank wealth management products are synonymous with "capital preservation and solid income". But this large-scale retreat has given everyone a slap in the face.
I also wrote a post a long time ago to explain the logic of bond investment.Interested friends can take a look at it first.：
GavinZeng: do you really understand the mechanism of bonds?
Why do institutions make money when they buy bonds, while retail investors may lose money when they buy bonds?
At this point, I'm going to say: bonds themselves are indeed a fixed income product, but bond funds and wealth management products are not.
The debt base itself is indeed an investment bond, and the bond is also a fixed income product, but the price of the bond itself will fluctuate after listing, so.