Regarding the topic 'Is the energy fund taking off, can we still get on board?', since it mentions the energy fund here, it is necessary to start with a simple classification of 'energy', that is, traditional energy and new energy. Traditional energy, also known as conventional energy, refers to widely producible and usable resources such as coal, oil, and natural gas, while new energy refers to energy sources such as solar energy, wind energy, and nuclear energy developed and utilized with emerging technologies. In fact, traditional energy and new energy are relative concepts. With the development of technology, new energy will also be included in conventional energy, and new batches of new energy will be discovered. In the long run, on the one hand, most of the traditional energy sources are non-renewable resources, and after many years of development, most energy sources have become scarce. On the other hand, with the global trend of carbon neutrality and ESG investing, the substitution of new energy for traditional energy in the future is definitely a development trend. However, in the short term, traditional energy will still dominate the energy structure. Currently, global inflation issues remain severe, and prices of bulk commodities and raw materials are soaring. The future development is still under observation. Meanwhile, the demand for resources continues to expand after the northern hemisphere enters the winter season. Currently, the global economy is still shrouded in the shadow of the pandemic, and supply-demand imbalances are bound to cause price fluctuations.
So, from an investment perspective, energy sector funds can actually be invested in at any time, just differentiate whether it is a long-term new energy vehicle or a traditional energy vehicle. Referring to the topic $BGF World Energy Fund (LU0788109394.MF)$